[WikiEN-l] Newbie biting, the 3RR, and improper labeling of vandalism

[Charli Li]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Todd Allen's mail client expels the following stream of bytes on
9/8/2007 7:44 PM:
> It would be improper not to block both. Vandalism doesn't include "edits
> which I believe to be against consensus", and it's pretty clear that
> Mm555 was doing nothing which could be legitimately considered
> vandalism. While it seems a block at this time would likely be punitive
> rather than preventative, it needs to be clarified that, firstly, an
> involved admin shouldn't have made the call, and secondly, "He's going
> against consensus!" is -not- a valid reason to violate 3RR.
>
Fully agree.  Scratch my "TMF did nothing wrong" part of my last
message; I am really having a bad day today.

- --
Charli (vishwin/O)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG4zar/5CaUKx925YRAqW9AJwOWZnIa9yJ9ZCzSoXn99phDKZfAwCgyCfR
gNVLHPWBb4m8b2hg3qmmiWw=
=UE9t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----