[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia struggles, Mozilla set for life?

[Bryan Derksen]

Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> By users you mean more than just the handful of active users? If the
>> active users who are freedom fanatics forked, their place would be
>> filled by the many contributors who don't contribute now due to the
>> amount of bureaucracy and philosophy that gets thrown around. Users
>> won't abandon Wikipedia because of ads, they never abandoned anyone
>> else because of it, why start with the single most handy resource on
>> the web.
> 
> If there were two Wikipedias, one with ads, one without, which do you
> think readers would go to? The only thing the original Wikipedia would
> have going for it is brand recognition. It would take time for people
> to learn about the ad-free version, but people would learn (possibly
> quite quickly, since I can see the media jumping on the story).

But if the Foundation has to resort to ads because there just isn't
enough money coming in from donations and other sources to keep running
otherwise, how is the ad-free fork going to manage any better?

I don't support ads in general, but if the choice is between Wikipedia
with ads and no Wikipedia at all I say stash a backup of the database
somewhere safe and then go for it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20071025/b21d4289/attachment.pgp