[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia:Excellent short articles

[Christiano Moreschi]

Poppycock. Bring me a shrubbery as well, why don't you? Who the hell equated pompous longevity with excellence? Since when was blessed brevity a vice, when it is the purest of all virtues? I've written articles starting with just one line "X is a person", with added categories - tell me that is not an excellent article. I've written up full plots of 4-hour baroque opera and I've written little cameos in virtuosity such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuseppe_Millico - tell me excellence cannot be found in both. Try and fail.

Moreschi

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.

> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:47:52 +0100
> From: phoenix.wiki at gmail.com
> To: wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia:Excellent short articles
> 
> On 10/20/07, Majorly <axel9891 at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 20/10/2007, Phoenix wiki <phoenix.wiki at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Surely an excellent article can't be
> > > short?
> > >
> >
> > Oh yes it can.
> 
> 
> Oh no it can't. It can be very good but if it's under 50-60 lines long then
> it can't be excellent
> 
> Phoenix 15


_________________________________________________________________
Celeb spotting – Play CelebMashup and win cool prizes
https://www.celebmashup.com