[WikiEN-l] Arbcom

[geni]

On 14/10/2007, Thatcher131 Wikipedia <thatcher131 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not have cases heard before a panel of 5 Arbitrators, randomly
> chosen from the list of Arbitrators active when the case was accepted?
>  Cases that are voted out 5-0 or 4-1 would close as is; cases where
> the votes were 3-2 or less would be heard before the entire committee.
>  That way, Arbitrators do not have to hear every case, and might not
> burn out as quickly. (A vote of 5-0 is all most cases get by the Fall
> of the year anyway.)
>
> Thatcher
>

Been suggested but check out the size of last years candidate pool for
the problem.

-- 
geni