[WikiEN-l] Is Slate an attack site?

[William Pietri]

Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Agger's article as favorable to Brandt.  I tend to read the 
> phrase "interesting take" as meaning "this is fun ti read, but hard to 
> believe."  The fact that the one "exposed" feature that he references 
> about Slim is the more extreme one that she is an MI-5 agent leaves me 
> with the impression that he considers Brandt to be a conspiracy theorist.
>   

I'd second that. He clearly suggests that Brandt is a nut. E.g., he 
introduces him with, "the conversation was a lot like discussing the 
grassy knoll circa 1966."  And he refers to the SlimVirgin bit with, 
"enter further into Brandt's matrix," which I read as "I think this is 
wacko-land".

Of course, to me, this underlines John's point. He can't even bring up 
an article that calls Brandt a conspiracy theorist and mentions the 
SV-as-MI5 bit as obvious nuttery without getting accused of acting in 
bad faith.

William

-- 
William Pietri <william at scissor.com>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_Pietri