[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[G MZ]

Durova said quite clearly on wikipedia that the response from the 5 ranged
from possitive to entheusiastic.

On 11/29/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2007 12:26 PM, Charlotte Webb <charlottethewebb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 11/28/07, SlimVirgin <slimvirgin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > As others have pointed out, the five editors she discussed it with may
> > > not even realize themselves who they are, because Durova may have
> > > mistaken no objections for positive feedback  -- or she may have
> > > thought that feedback about her case study was the same as feedback
> > > about a block. So the implication that there are five editors
> somewhere
> > > in hiding, letting Durova face the music alone, misses the point that
> > > they may have said X, but Durova heard Y. There is therefore no point
> > > in conducting a witchhunt.
> >
> > For once, Slim, I hope one of your explanations is correct. Of course
> nobody will really know for sure unless they have a generally accurate idea
> as to what, if anything, was actually said.
>
> Actually, you do know for sure. Matt said it, Guy said it, Slim said
> it, and I'm sure they all "have a generally accurate idea as to what,
> if anything, was actually said."
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>