[WikiEN-l] Balance of sanction [Was: Arbiter involvement on the Durova affair]

[jayjg]

On Nov 30, 2007 11:51 AM, Kwan Ting Chan <ktc at ktchan.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 16:45 +0000, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:30:56 +0000, Kwan Ting Chan <ktc at ktchan.info>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >As a result Durova escapes any meaningful sanction for her actions.
> >
> > What, apart from losing all her credibility,
>
> Then trash Giano's credibility all you like.
>
> > her sysop bit and her shot at ArbCom you mean?
>
> And I quote the original passage: "An admin bit is not some shield that
> can be used to deflect a blow, something we can drop in lieu of a
> sanction. Should we issue Giano with an admin bit so he can be forced to
> give it up as punishment?"
>
> She won't now have a shot at ArbCom. Big wow. Now compare to the various
> proposed remedies of banning for 90 days, restricted editing in
> Wikipedia namespace etc. *point to the subject line of "balance of
> sanction*.
>
> KTC

What additional sanctions do you think would be appropriate for an
erroneous block that was undone in 72 minutes?