[WikiEN-l] Arbiter involvement on the Durova affair

[jayjg]

On Nov 30, 2007 10:37 AM, Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/30/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:21:13 -0500, Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >David and Guy, both Paul August (in the ANI subpage) and Mackensen (on
> > the
> > >Proposed Decisions talk page) have stated that Arbcom did *not* receive a
> > >copy of the list post; it appears that many members of Arbcom first saw
> > >Durova's post when Giano published it on ANI.
> >
> > My mistake: *some* arbitrators had it, and the rest could have had
> > it for the asking.
> >
> > Oh, and Giano could have mailed it not posted it publicly.
> >
> > Plus that wasn't the crucial piece of information that exonerated !!
> > (that was never published).
> >
> > But I guess the words "Giano" and "email" were accurate :-)
> >
> > Guy (JzG)
> > --
> > http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
>
>
>
> Guy, it was clear that you had it too, from your posts.  It seems absurd
> that you would hold Giano to a higher standard than you would hold
> yourself.  I repeat - NOBODY on any side of this debate emailed that post to
> the Arbcom mailing list.  Not one.

Why do you keep repeating this claim when it's simply not true?