[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[jayjg]

On Nov 29, 2007 7:45 PM, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 7:39 PM, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 2007 7:36 PM, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
> > > On Nov 29, 2007 7:33 PM, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Did you read Sam's post on the subject?
> > > >
> > > Yes, I did, and I can only conclude that he wasn't referring to that
> > > particular quote.
> >
> > How do you reconcile that with the fact that he specifically referred
> > to that particular quote?
> >
> I guess I can't.  Is the point you're arguing about that "Durova"
> merely discussed "the investigation" with five people, and not "the
> block"?  Because if so, I don't see the difference.  The mere fact
> that she discussed that twisted "investigation" with people is enough
> for us to ask for more information.

You don't see any difference between an investigation and a block?
Need I remind you that only blocking is an admin action? Need I also
remind you that the thrust of Durova's investigation appears to have
been that !! was the reincarnation of a previous experienced editor;
which, of course, was quite true?