[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[jayjg]

On Nov 28, 2007 3:39 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 28, 2007 3:02 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > The community is the judge and jury of every admin action.
> > > Particularly when there is an Request for Comments from the community.
> > >    Remember us-- the community?  Every admin is theoretically supposed
> > > to have our trust?
> >
> > The community can comment without seeing personal e-mails,
>
> Heck, the community can comment without getting to see any of the
> evidence!  But if you actually care about what the community is going
> to say, and plan to listen to it somehow,  you have to show them the
> evidence.

It's not clear what you're saying; what is the purpose of the RFC, in your view?

>
> > and the RfC
> > became moot when the RFAR was opened.
>
> RFCs are never moot because of an RFAr.  Consensus trumps Arbcom--
> Arbcom's just there for those gray cases where we prior dispute
> resolution couldn't come to consensus.

So once the RFAR opened, what was the purpose of the RFC?