[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[jayjg]

On Nov 27, 2007 12:19 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/27/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > So now, in addition to the two aforementioned lists, there's some
> > other set of people "colluding" privately off-wiki to take action
> > based on e-mails to the lists? O.K., let's assume for the moment that
> > this bizarrely bad-faith theory is true. What on earth does it have to
> > do with Wikipedia any more? Wikipedians privately e-mail each other
> > hundreds, perhaps thousands of times a day. What do you propose to do
> > about that?
>
> For starters:
>
> I propose that they show the community and/or the full arbcom all the
> emails that led to the erroneous blocks, so we can see if the
> endorsers behavior & judgment needs to be examined as well.
>
> That seems pretty simple, yes?

Alec, as has been pointed out to you several times, both Matthew and
Guy have stated that Durova did not ask for permission to block
anyone. So, what e-mails could have possibly "led to the erroneous
blocks", and how could there possibly be any "endorsers"?