[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[Alec Conroy]

On 11/27/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
> There's an ArbCom election coming up, can you imagine the damage that
> would be done to ArbCom's credibility if it were to come out afterward
> that members that were up for election were involved in this and their
> involvement was known but we weren't told about it before voting?

SUPPOSEDLY, if I understand the shape of things , that's not a
scenario you have to worry about.

Supposedly, the names of everybody involved has already been revealed
by one or more list participants.  Anyone who hasn't come forward
before the start of the election is, supposedly, going to have their
involvement revealed and substantiated with evidence.  But of course,
nobody wants it to come to that--  it would be better for the
community (and much less dramatic) if everyone involved comes forward
on their own, so atleast until the election starts, THERE IS NO
DEADLINE.

Again, that's not coming from me.  I don't have the full list names or
the emails, and I won't be the one doing any revealing.  Despite my
verbosity,  I'm really not that involved in this dispute-- I've been
playing catch up from the start, and I'm always the last person to
hear about these things.

Alec