[WikiEN-l] "Consistent" Section naming & order rules?

[Ray Saintonge]

Steve Bennett wrote:
> Consistent rules should be laid out in the Manual of Style.
> Unfortunately, frequently the MoS gives up and says "you can do it
> this way or this way, there's no consensus".
>   
That's fine.  No consensus needs to be taken at face value.  Over an 
extended period of time one style may come to dominate, but there should 
be no rush to impose one way or the other.  Consistency is a secondary 
feature.
> Fwiw, I think "sources" and "further reading" are better terms. Most
> of our references *are* external links - we just want to distinguish
> between those sites that contributed to the information in the
> article, and those which go beyond it.
If the principal editor of an article sees it differently it's not worth 
arguing with him about it. 

Ec