[WikiEN-l] Pakistani politicians and systemic bias

[charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com]

"David Gerard" wrote

> On 15/11/2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote
> > OK, so now let's make a proposal and see if it gains support.
> > Who's good at writing such stuff?
 
> Charles would be a good one.

Well thanks <s> a bunch </s> for the vote of confidence.

What is the actual issue? I think it is that inappropriate  speedy nominations are proportionately more of a serious issue than "speedy keeps" at AfD; and certainly more a problem than inappropriate PROD nominations (PROD seems to be applied in a much more reaonable, even way). Of the three processes, the "triage" is at its most serious in CSD. When AfD gets it wrong it is at least after more eyeballs than two, possibly bloodshot.

Nominations under G1, G11, A1 and A7 all can be problematic. Careless use of terms "nonsense", "promotion", "no context", "non-notable" should be deprecated. These are not synonyms with "hard to read", "informative", "obscure topic", "out-of-the-way or annoying to me" (respectively). Basically we need to formulate something that isolates a bit better where things fall down the cracks in the system.

Charles

-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam