[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[jayjg]

On 5/30/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I understand. Let me phrase it this way: RFA. Bob runs for adminship. Bob
> > has good edits, good this, good that. He'd likely be a fine canidate and a
> > fine admin. John alleges, on Bob's RFA, that Bob is a regular contributor to
> > an attack site. Someone asks for proof of this. Here are three questions for
> > both you and Slim, and others:
> >
> > 1. How can John offer proof? We can't link to attack sites. Is John supposed
> > to name the site, and tell people what to search for?
>
> Name the site, and give the date and time of the posts; or upload
> screenshots; or better still ask John to confirm or deny that he's a
> regular poster. If he confirms, no need to link. If he denies, no
> point in linking.

That would work.