[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[Slim Virgin]

On 5/30/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi at gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand. Let me phrase it this way: RFA. Bob runs for adminship. Bob
> has good edits, good this, good that. He'd likely be a fine canidate and a
> fine admin. John alleges, on Bob's RFA, that Bob is a regular contributor to
> an attack site. Someone asks for proof of this. Here are three questions for
> both you and Slim, and others:
>
> 1. How can John offer proof? We can't link to attack sites. Is John supposed
> to name the site, and tell people what to search for?

Name the site, and give the date and time of the posts; or upload
screenshots; or better still ask John to confirm or deny that he's a
regular poster. If he confirms, no need to link. If he denies, no
point in linking.