[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[Ken Arromdee]

On Wed, 30 May 2007, Slim Virgin wrote:
> Now, given that definition, I can't see why anyone reasonable would
> object to a "no links to attack sites" rule of thumb. We don't even
> link to sites that engage in copyright violation. Even when we only
> *suspect* copyright violation, we err on the side of caution.

We don't link *to suspected copyright violating materials*.  We don't ban
links to sites that we suspect copyright violation on.