[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[jayjg]

On 5/30/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So you're saying that if WR were actually notable, and if we had an
> > article on it, then that would justify having a link to the page. When
> > else would we link to it, outside of that unlikely circumstance?
>
>
> If the site was notable enough for inclusion, then yes, it should have a
> link back, the same as any other web enterprise. That's not even really a
> question, is it?

Not really, but the odds of that site becoming notable are pretty low.

>
> For other circumstances, it was alleged by some in Gracenote's RFA that he
> was a Wikipedia Review poster. Where was the evidence? Without evidence, it
> was basically poisoning the well, and that poor guy's name. E-defamation, or
> wikifamation, I suppose.

Are you asking whether or not it was true, or making a point about
linking to his posts on WR?