[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[jayjg]

On 5/30/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, in the extremely unlikely event that WR became notable, we might
> > want to have a link to the website on the article about the website.
> > That's one. I've heard one more possibility advanced so far, if there
> > were an arbcom case that involved evidence on WR.
> >
> With the latter, all we'd have to do is e-mail the link, or a
> screenshot of the post, to the ArbCom.

Both of which are much better solutions, since there's no guarantee
that such a post would stay up very long, once revealed. As far as I
can tell, the only way to 100% ensure WR will keep a post up is if you
send them an e-mail insisting they take it down because it is
slanderous or libellous.