[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[jayjg]

On 5/30/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > WR doesn't qualify for citation under [[WP:V]] or [[WP:RS]].
>
> Do we have to recapitulate all the old arguments? There are NO links
> to WR in article space, and IIRC none in article talk space either.
> ALL of the links are in user or project space or their talk pages,
> where those policies are not germane in the way that is implied here.
> There are numerous RfC/ArbCom links to WR, which is hardly surprising,
> since it is the ONLY reliable source as to its own content.

So you're saying that linking to WR might be of benefit in an ArbCom
case which used WR posts as evidence. How would it benefit Wikipedia
to link to WR in User or Project space?