[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[Slim Virgin]

On 5/30/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/30/07, Blu Aardvark <jeffrey.latham at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Right, but Arbcom is not designed to write or replace policy, and
> > > certainly not to override common sense. Now, granted, there are
> > > relatively few occasions where a link to a site such as Wikipedia Review
> > > is beneficial to the project, but it should be acknowledged that these
> > > occasions exist,
> >
> > Actually, I can't think of any occasion where such a link would be
> > beneficial to the project. What exactly did you have in mind?
>
> Not this again... Someone apparently thought it was worthwhile to cite
> a criticism from WR in the Expert rebellion discussion. In the case of
> TNH's blog, it is being used to cite numerous articles. One does not
> need to think of occaisions; the uses are already out there.
>
TNH's blog is not an attack site. I can't think of any situation where
it would be necessary to link to WR or ED.