[WikiEN-l] Another "BADSITES" controversy

[The Mangoe]

On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Blu Aardvark <jeffrey.latham at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Right, but Arbcom is not designed to write or replace policy, and
> > certainly not to override common sense. Now, granted, there are
> > relatively few occasions where a link to a site such as Wikipedia Review
> > is beneficial to the project, but it should be acknowledged that these
> > occasions exist,
>
> Actually, I can't think of any occasion where such a link would be
> beneficial to the project. What exactly did you have in mind?

Not this again... Someone apparently thought it was worthwhile to cite
a criticism from WR in the Expert rebellion discussion. In the case of
TNH's blog, it is being used to cite numerous articles. One does not
need to think of occaisions; the uses are already out there.