[WikiEN-l] BADSITES vs RFA

[jayjg]

On 5/29/07, Gabe Johnson <gjzilla at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/29/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/29/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Gracenotes' RFA has been suspended by the 'crats:
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gracenotes
> > >
> > > There is no indication as to what this actually means for the RFA.
> > >
> > > Well done to the advocates of BADSITES, and I look forward to the
> > > thorough nobbling of RFA by this means by others who can gather up
> > > some agenda-pushers. I can't wait for the nationalists to get into
> > > this one.
> >
> > David, as has been pointed out, the only people advocating BADSITES on
> > this one were supporters, who were using it as a straw man to bash
> > opposers. I didn't see any opposers referring to it.
> >
>
> They were reffering to the basic issue, however. Plus they were
> basically advocating the policy. ~~~~

No, they weren't, and they're rather tired of continually being
strawmanned that way.