[WikiEN-l] A BADSITES RfA piling-on
Fred Bauder
fredbaud at waterwiki.info
Mon May 28 14:05:34 UTC 2007
Thanks for the heads-up. Bottom line, this guy doesn't get it. How hurtful external attacks can be to Wikipedia users. He has minimal commitment to taking effective action, maximum commitment to dissimulation.
Fred
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel R. Tobias [mailto:dan at tobias.name]
>Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 07:31 AM
>To: wikien-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>Subject: [WikiEN-l] A BADSITES RfA piling-on
>
>Another thing in the subject of the BADSITES controversy, take a look
>at this Request for Adminship:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Gracenot
>es
>
>(not to be confused with [[User:Grace Note]], a totally separate
>person, and one who actually is one of the opposers in the above
>nomination; interestingly, though "Grace" is usually a girl's name,
>they're both guys, which shows you can never reliably infer gender
>from usernames)
>
>This user has been the subject of a massive piling-on of oppose
>votes, most of them coming simply because he refuses to take a
>totally politically correct position favoring the draconian, zero-
>tolerance policy on removing links to so-called "attack sites".
>
>Despite (or maybe because of) this, he's also got more support votes
>than any other current RfA (it's currently 161 to 60, meaning that
>101 more people support him than oppose him), but this might not be a
>high enough percentage to satisfy whoever closes the RfA (is there a
>set percentage, or is it just up to a subjective value judgment like
>most other debate-closing on Wikipedia?)
>
>There are some people in the Support column who are notable for
>saying that they oppose him on the attack-sites issue but still don't
>consider it a "litmus test" that bars their support for him (after
>all, having administrator's tools has little or no connection with
>one's beliefs or actions regarding attack-site links... adding,
>dropping, restoring, and edit-warring over such links does not
>require admin powers). However, a bunch of others seem to be single-
>issue voters determined to torpedo any prospective admin who doesn't
>toe the line entirely.
>
>--
>== Dan ==
>Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
>Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
>Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>WikiEN-l mailing list
>WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list