[WikiEN-l] Workable spoiler solution?

[David Gerard]

On 20/05/07, Ken Arromdee <arromdee at rahul.net> wrote:

> This is nonsense.  People don't read Wikipedia for "the knowledge", as if
> the only possibilities were all knowledge or none.  They may want some
> knowledge without wanting other knowledge; spoilers may fall in the second
> category.


"may" here seems to include "may not". i.e., this is conjecture. Do
you have any evidence for it?

(Six years, zero complaints.)


- d.