[WikiEN-l] Stupidity toward experts
Will Beback
will.beback.1 at gmail.com
Thu May 17 22:51:08 UTC 2007
Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 17:05:29 +0100, "David Gerard" <dgerard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> ove the bit where burntsauce tells Patrick Nielsen Hayden to get a
>>
>>
> reliable source.Love even more the bit where several editors tell him, in words of one
> syllable and with skilful use of withering scorn, exactly who he has
> just insulted :-)
>
> Guy (JzG)
>
There are two kinds of experts: those who are involved actively in their
subjects and those who simply study them. With either type there is a
danger in conflating expertise with neutrality but it is especially a
problem when the experts have business or personal connections to the
subjects. While I realize that Patrick and Theresa Nielsen Hayden are
major figures in their field that does not mean that they are neutral
commentators. In fact, their history at Wikipedia shows just the
opposite. Assertions by an expert who has an interest in a subject may
be useful but we should not abdicate our usual procedures just because
the famous person decides to give us their input. While their comments
may be a reliable source for their opinions, their opinions don't trump
NPOV, OR, and V.
Will Beback
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list