[WikiEN-l] Stupidity toward experts

[David Goodman]

What is much more promising is that a great many eds, have endorsed
the view that the internet is in some cases a reliable source,
especially for internet phenomena; the count at this point is at 26
keep, 5 delete, removing duplicates.

I particularly call attention to  Kim Bruning's: "Seeing the unique
situation where this Articles for Deletion discussion probably counts
as a reliable source all by itself now, shall we keep early?"

I think it will be a useful precedent or at least starting point for
further discussions.

DGG

On 5/17/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/17/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_D._Nicoll_%282nd_nomination%29
> >
> > Love the bit where burntsauce tells Patrick Nielsen Hayden to get a
> > reliable source.
>
>
> Someone ought to just reply with:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Nielsen_Hayden
>
>
> Regards,
> Joe
> http://www.joeszilagyi.com
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>


-- 
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.