[WikiEN-l] Spoilers - Ned Scott's comment

[Matthew Brown]

On 5/16/07, Erik Moeller <erik at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Philip Sandifer <snowspinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Indeed. I tend to think that MfD is a very brutal way to change
> > policy. On the other hand, if you can actually get a 2/3 or so
> > consensus to delete
>
> 2/3 is not a consensus. It's a supermajority.

However, a supermajority against something is proof there is not a
consensus FOR it - even a rough one.

-Matt