[WikiEN-l] Notability on the skfields

[Steve Bennett]

On 5/15/07, Todd Allen <toddmallen at gmail.com> wrote:
> But that aside, it should still be deleted. There's a good reason to
> require a significant amount of independent sourcing. First-party
> sources may be biased, promotional, inaccurate, incomplete, technically
> correct but deliberately misleading, or any combination of the above.

They may be. And they may not. And by providing an alternative to
bare-faced first-party sources, we are doing the world a favour.

Steve