[WikiEN-l] Notability on the skfields

[Bryan Derksen]

geni wrote:
> Currently [[Invincible Snowfields]] is trying to get around this by
> very careful wording that contains no opinion whatsoever (and gets
> close to succeeding) but since NPOV demands that you do include
> opinion this is not a valid get out either.

But you're demanding that in order to be NPOV [[Invincible Snowfields]]
must include a _completely made up_ opinion that _nobody actually
holds_. This is not what NPOV requires. This is madness.

> In short requiring articles be NPOV is a notability standard and for
> certain things quite a tough one.

Verifiability might be interpreted as a notability standard, but NPOV
not so much (and certainly not your strange interpretation of NPOV). If
every single person in the whole wide world stood up tomorrow and
shouted in unison "Invincible Snowfields in only accessible by
helicopter!" The correct response is not to conclude "well, I guess it
isn't notable since there are no dissenting POVs we can write about."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20070514/741563a8/attachment.pgp