[WikiEN-l] Notability on the skfields

[Philip Sandifer]

On May 14, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Todd Allen wrote:

> If everything can fit comfortably in a list, why have individual
> articles? And if only some are too long to fit in the list, why not  
> have
> some individual articles and some anchored redirects?

Essentially, HCI reasons. If it's possible to give somebody the  
article they asked for when they typed something into the search box,  
we should default to doing so. That is to say, barring a persuasive  
reason why a given article is causing us a problem, we should keep  
it. Which is why AfD has a "presumption of innocence."

There are some articles that there are good reasons to delete - "we  
can't verify the content of this article," "this article is  
impossible to write from a NPOV," or even, in the case of BLP, "the  
risk that this article would defame and harm its subject outweighs  
the benefit of keeping it," which is in its own way a notability  
judgment. And in those cases we delete them.

What harm is done by keeping [[Invincible Snowfields]]? What does  
keeping it cause that is bad?

-Phil