[WikiEN-l] Notability on the skfields

[Ken Arromdee]

On Sun, 13 May 2007, Todd Allen wrote:
> In that case, the subject would do better by both himself and us by
> -having the sources correct themselves-. Reputable sources will be
> willing to publish corrections if you can show them they're wrong.

Really?

Does that mean that if the source refuses to publish a correction they aren't
a reputable source any more and Wikipedia has to stop using it?