[WikiEN-l] Notability on the skfields

[Ray Saintonge]

Thomas Dalton wrote:

>>What is gained by creating this second class of verifiability? Why do
>>article topics need to be super-verified? Or, more specifically, why
>>is normal, garden-variety verifiability not good enough for article
>>topics? And if it's not good enough for article topics, why is it
>>good enough for your garden variety information?
>>    
>>
>Regardless of what you call it, it is perfectly obvious that the
>threshold for including something in an article should be lower than
>the threshold for giving something its own article. The alternative
>would result in Wikipedia being a website containing billions is
>interlinked stubs with nothing else since as soon as anything was
>deemed worthy of getting added to an article it would be split of into
>its own article.
>
Sure, but when something falls in that intermediate range between the 
two levels we have an argument for merger, and clearly not for deletion.

Ec