[WikiEN-l] Daniel Brandt & other banned users posting still

[geni]

On 3/28/07, Denny Colt <wikidenny at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/28/07, Oldak Quill <oldakquill at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This discussion isn't about allowing certain banned users to continue
> > editing, it is about not reverting particular kinds of edits
> > regardless of whether the user is banned or not (the argument being
> > that to revert the edits doesn't benefit Wikipedia and expends energy
> > unnecessarily).
> >
> > --
> > Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)
>
>
> Actually thats exactly it. People edit warred with me to ensure brandt's
> words stayed up. I don't understand why he gets a free pass, as Erica said.
> Either all banned users should, or none. If they want to contribute... use a
> different name. If we KNOW it's them, rv them as policy says. If that isn't
> right, change the policy.
>
> - Denny

Arbcom have in the past ruled that acting as a proxy for a blocked
user is a serious offence.

-- 
geni