[WikiEN-l] Just what *is* Jimbo's role anyway? - "nofollow" decision

[Anthony]

On 3/22/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:01:36 -0400 (EDT), "Jeff Raymond"
> <jeff.raymond at internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
>
> >That is, if there was *really* an immediate spammer problem to be had.  I
> >recall Brad Patrick's breathless essay about how inundated we're getting
> >with spam, and then the G11 abomination occurred, but the actual necessity
> >of such a reaction was never really introduced - we seem to be extremely
> >trusting of those in the home office, don't we?
>
> We were inundated with spam.  We still are.  G11 is a necessary tool,
> and in any case we could creatively delete blatant spam as vandalism
> anyway.  The vast majority of G11 tagged articles *are* abominations,
> unlike G11.  Spend time looking at CAT:CSD some time.
>
Personally I like I95.  With BBD/JLD doing 72 in a 98 328i.  LMAO.

Anthony