[WikiEN-l] Radical redefinition of OR

[Jimmy Wales]

Guettarda wrote:
> At WP:ATT he has said the the issue was not the use of primary sources, but
> the generation of novel conclusions based on the sources.  Of course, that
> totally contradicts his original posting, where he says that the material
> should not be reintroduced unless it is supported by secondary sources.  

That is not a contradiction at all.  If you can produce a source which 
tells us that this obscure lawsuit was important, and which echoes your 
original research and analysis into what happened, then re-insert it 
with appropriate sourcing.  In the meantime the reliance on your own 
original historical research is problematic, and you should not 
reintroduce it until you have a secondary source.

--Jimbo