[WikiEN-l] Jimbo's rejection of [[WP:ATT]]

[stevertigo]

On 3/20/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner at gmail.com> wrote:

> Try a Google News search on their names. It's a fun game - you get
> about 750 hits for Jimmy and about 8 for Anthere.

Google searches are not reliable sources - for anything.

> This really is just worthless nitpicking on your point. In terms of
> policy on en, Jimbo does have a special role as, to use a phrase we
> haven't in a while, God King.

I would not regard Eriks comments in any way as "worthless
nitpicking".  The "God King" term is way exaggerated, and besides the
point, which is simply that Jimbo should simply be trusted.

> On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> > There is no legal basis to any role Jimmy has in the English Wikipedia
> > (and which the community, not the Board, permits him to exercise).
> > Wikipedia is not "Jimmy's website" by any measure, be it ownership,
> > representation, or legal control. That is misinformation.

Im sorry if my comments were misunderstood. There seems to be a lot of
misunderstanding in not just this thread but in this policy discussion
in general.

Regards,

-Stevertigo