[WikiEN-l] Radical redefinition of OR

[George Herbert]

On 3/20/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > That article isn't based on primary sources that I can see.
>
> Scientific papers are primary sources.

I'm still trying to track down all of what Jimbo said, but my input on
this would be that extending guidelines about OR from one field to
another completely unrelated one is always a bad idea, and that
appears to be what you're doing here.


-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com