[WikiEN-l] Jimbo's rejection of [[WP:ATT]]

[Slim Virgin]

On 3/20/07, jf_wikipedia <jf_wikipedia at mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Slim Virgin wrote:
>
> > The merge was popular, smooth, there were no changes to policy, and
> > ATT has quickly become a widely used page, so I'm assuming this was a
> > misunderstanding that will be sorted out soon enough.
>
>
> I am not so sure, SlimVirgin.
>
> This is what he writes. He calls ATT a "monumentally bad idea". What
> needs to be clarified is that the distintions between V, RS and OR
> not only have been maintained in WP:ATT, but their formulation
> synchronized with one another as well.
>
Exactly, and I hope when he realizes that he'll reconsider what he did
today. I do think it was based on a misunderstanding prompted by the
discussion on the list about the Langan article.

Sarah