[WikiEN-l] Proposal for simplified credentials model
William Pietri
william at scissor.com
Fri Mar 9 06:06:21 UTC 2007
K P wrote:
> I don't think credentials is the answer to the Essjay problem, because I
> think the problem was with the press, not with Wikipedia.
For me, the external problem went well beyond the press. Essjay claiming
he had a couple of doctorates was not so good, and using them in content
disputes was worse. But I think the real problem came when he claimed to
be a tenured professor, trying to make both himself and Wikipedia look
better by drawing on the social standing we give to professors. That he
did it in the press is what made the problem such a big deal externally,
but you can't blame them for reporting things people care about.
As the Chronicle of Higher Education wrote, "But the incident is clearly
damaging to Wikipedia's credibility -- especially with professors who
will now note that one of the site's most visible academics has turned
out to be a fraud."
Looking at [[User:Jimbo Wales/Credential Verification]] it looks like
the proposal would try to cover situations like this, so I think
credential verification could have at least helped were it widely used.
William
--
William Pietri <william at scissor.com>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_Pietri
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list