I dropped the journalist who wrote this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/06/wwiki106.xml a note commenting on a few errors and she corrected it to this version: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/07/nspam207.xml which is more accurate. To let people know :) -- Gary Kirk