[WikiEN-l] Is editing for payment a fundamentally problematic conflict of interest?
William Pietri
william at scissor.com
Sun Mar 4 16:29:17 UTC 2007
Marc Riddell wrote:
> Huh!?!
>
> How would giving away the money you are paid for doing work make that work
> any more credible? What about the credibility and integrity of the person
> doing that work? Ever hear of trust!?!
>
> As for "good editors losing their neutrality when money is involved" - to
> make this statement work you need to remove the word "good".
>
Absolutely. That's why journalists regularly take payments from people
they are covering in the news. A "good" journalist would have no problem
writing a fair article, no matter who's giving them money. We trust
them, so there's no problem.
Wait, no. It's just the opposite. That's called a conflict of interest.
And behavior like that is strictly forbidden by any journalistic code of
ethics I've ever seen. E.g.:
Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than
the public's right to know.
Journalists should:
* Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
* Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise
integrity or damage credibility.
* Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment,
and shun secondary employment, political involvement, public
office and service in community organizations if they
compromise journalistic integrity.
* Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
* Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power
accountable.
* Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests
and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.
* Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money;
avoid bidding for news.
(from the "Act Independently" section of http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp)
We ignore their historically evolved and time-tested solution at our
great peril.
William
--
William Pietri <william at scissor.com>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_Pietri
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list