[WikiEN-l] Attack Site Wars, Episode VII... The Return of the Essjay

C.J. Croy cjcroy at gmail.com
Fri Jun 29 03:14:35 UTC 2007


On 6/28/07, Blu Aardvark <jeffrey.latham at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why does Wikipedia have to have an entry on everything that is reported
> by some media source or other?
>
> Yes, the event was covered by a few reliable sources, but it didn't take
> long for the media to forget all about it.

The media hasn't forgotten about it.  In the last three months, the
following publications have all mentioned the Essjay fiasco when
discussing Wikipedia.
-InformationWeek (June 4th)
-PC Magazine(May 22)
-U.S. Catholic (May)
-Sunday Times (apr 22)
-LA Times (Apr 9)
-Jerusalem Post (Apr 6)
-et Cetera magazine (Apr)
-The Grand Rapids Press (Apr 1)

Essjay isn't going away any time soon.



More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list