[WikiEN-l] Arbcom member's prolix script for foul play

[cu clt]

Racist? me? You sound funny.
I am talking about the abuse of a pro-Hindu Arbcom member against a avowed
Hindu editor, User:Rama's Arrow, while holding both in contempt for their
relgious prejudices.
What do you find racist here?
Now see,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rama%27s_Arrow

The fellow has 11 FAs to his credit  while the Arbcom guy has one or two
piss poor FAs on some cricketers and a huge pile of stupid Dyks.
There was a time when Rama's Arrow should have been blocked for his
incivility. When he heaped abuse on User:Mel Etitis none of these trolls
spoke against him because he was one among them. Now they are at his throats
and they have won.




On 6/19/07, George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can someone put this racist nutter on moderation and keep him there?
>
> -george
>
> On 6/18/07, cu clt <abcclt at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The Yellow Monkey (as Arbcom member Blnguyen calls himself) has once
> again
> > exposed his saffron (Hindu revivalist) colour. I earlier mentioned his
> > petting and patting the arch troll
> > [[User:Bakasuprman<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bakasuprman>]].
> > Bakasuprman and another user were blocked for one week for prolonged
> > edit-warring.  The block imposed by an uninvolved admin came after a
> > discussion on ANI. However, Blnguyen has unilaterally overturned the
> block
> > with the support of his regular army of Hindutva trolls.
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#edit-warring_duo
> >
> > The unholy alliance between Bakasuprman and Arbcom member Blnguyen has
> been
> > known for some time. For example, Bakasuprman has been taking his cue
> from
> > Blnguyen to violate civility regularly.
> >
> > "Also stringing together an issue of politics/religion with another
> editors
> > issues with history is hardly indicative of any sting of unreliability.
> Your
> > Ad hominem circumstantial<
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem#Ad_hominem_circumstantial>argument
> > does not hold, and bringing up
> > WP:CIVIL <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CIVIL> is useless because as
> > User:Blnguyen <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Blnguyen>, an
> arbitrator
> > has noted, civility is disregarded in India related matters."
> > The quote is from a comment of Bakasuprman at an RfC.
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Freedom_skies/Workshop
> > Another editor specifically requested Blnguyen to make clear the
> statememtn
> > ascribed to him. Blnguyen didn't comply.
> >
> > Such a partisan Arbcom member is detrimental to the project.
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
>
>
> --
> -george william herbert
> george.herbert at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>



-- 
____|
______________
______________|___________
_____________________________
___________13_______________________|