[WikiEN-l] Editing with open proxies

[James Farrar]

On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/17/07, James Farrar <james.farrar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 17/06/07, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 6/17/07, James Farrar <james.farrar at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > AGF lasts only until proven that it shouldn't.
> > >
> > > In my case, of course, it never started, and were is the EVIDENCE that
> > > it now "shouldn't".
> >
> > Your behaviour in perpetually failing to answer a straight question
> > from me with a straight answer.
>
> As opposed to CW's identical behavior?

Which straight questions from me has she not answered?

> > I am now minded to believe that you will never answer these two questions.
>
> Well, as explained before, I've already answered one of the questions,

I asked you for a link to that, since it wasn't answered in this
thread. You didn't answer that, either.

> and you're neither a prosecutor nor a judge.

When did I say I was?

> There's no particular
> reason I should answer questions from an obviously hostile questioner
> who has been applying outrageous double standards in this incident
> from the very start.

Seriously: I *want* you to tell me that you informed her of her policy
violation, and that she continued to violate policy. If you do that,
*then* I will support you, and oppose her nomination. But you
*haven't*; conspicuously so. If at the start of this, you had simply
given me a date when you did so, then you wouldn't have been bombarded
with a dozen or more unnecessary emails from me.

If my questioning is hostile, it is because your answers, such as they
are, leave a great deal to be desired.

Answer the questions. Please.