[WikiEN-l] Editing with open proxies

[jayjg]

On 6/16/07, Steve Summit <scs at eskimo.com> wrote:
>
> Slim Virgin wrote:
> > CW had accepted the nom; hadn't mentioned the open proxies; and people
> > had started commenting. It's not clear there was time for an e-mail
> > correspondence. It was up to CW to sort this out *before* accepting
> > the nom.
>
> Is this in the RfA guidelines?  "If you've been using an open
> proxy to edit, in violation of WP:NOP, first figure out a
> plausible reason for having done so."  Will that be in there now?
>
> This all reminds me of the neverending shenanigans over political
> appointments in the U.S., whenever there's a different party
> in the executive and legislative branches.  Every time, the
> stonewalling party has to figure out a new way to torpedo the
> evil other party's appointment, since all the old tricks are
> known and circumvented by now.


Since when did CharlotteWebb become part of  "the other party", and what is
the platform of the "stonewalling party"?