[WikiEN-l] [[Daniel Brandt]] is gone again

[Anthony]

On 6/15/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray at gmail.com> wrote:
> The purpose is to stop the first google hit on someone's name being
> "self-promotional vanity tripe", which is a little cruel even when
> they did write the article - and when, as so often happens, they
> *didn't*, it's just nasty.
>
> Most AFDs on people are filled with not particularly nice comments.
> It's dine we keep them for internal purposes, but it seems fair to
> stop leaving them obviously public to be stumbled upon. Blanking
> doesn't hide that there was a debate or hide the decision; what it
> *does* do is hide the most stupid excesses of the discussion.
>
The same could be said of requests for arbitration.  Can we blank them too?