[WikiEN-l] [[Daniel Brandt]] is gone again

[jayjg]

On 6/14/07, Rob Church <robchur at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/14/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
> > I pointed out
> > that this would violate the GFDL I got a response from Slim Virgin that
> > "This is no time to worry about the GFDL."
>
> This demonstrates the best example of SlimVirgin's little crusade
> against Brandt, because it demonstrates that she is willing to risk
> Wikipedia's legal integrity for the sake of winning it.

"little crusade against Brandt"? What does that mean?

Anyway, it's actually a good example of selective quoting; read
further in the thread to understand what was actually said.