[WikiEN-l] Banned from Wikipedia? WHAT? YOU MOFO! UNBAN ME!

[RCT-Thrillville]

Yeah, I have anger problems.

forum moderators MUST unblock me otherwise i will spam this mother----ing
forum.

REPLY IMMEDIATELY.
it is a waste of time that jimbo wales did not reply this message as the
wikipedia police still have not got back to me because removing semi
protection tags is against wikipedia policy, and the ONLY COURSE IS EMAILING
JIMBO WALES in this park.

"Wikipedia enforces a zero tolerance policy in regards to wiki vandalism in
the park. There is a MOTHER FUCKING possiblilty that you will be banned from
the English Wikipedia if you continue to do any vandalism in the park."

AND THIS MESSAGE:

"Sorry, your request to be unblocked has been ignored because you were
trolling. You will get a message that say "This user is no longer a member
of the English Wikipedia." If you are banned from Wikipedia forever you are
prohibited to use Wikipedia!"

im gonna fire brad patrick permanently in this park. if no one replies the
email to request unblocking, will you send an email to the wikipedia police
so i can get unblocked right away.


Reviewing the text of one of the BJAODN pages Jeffrey O Gustafson deleted
and then wheel-warred to protect his action ([[Wikipedia:All Your Bad Joke
And Other Deleted Nonsense Are Belong To
Us<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:All_Your_Bad_Joke_And_Other_Deleted_Nonsense_Are_Belong_To_Us&action=edit>]],
it's clear that JOG's unilateral action is unsupportable. He claims massive
copyright violation, but the earliest entry to the page was Navigium
Flammae, whose history exists in the database.

If Jeffrey O Gustafson's intentions were pure, he would have done the work
to make the pages compliant with *his interpretation* of the GFDL by merging
edit histories.

Instead he deleted the page out of process. And since deletion with the
claim of copyright violation are protected from content review  (c.f.
[[Wikipedia:Deletion
review]]: "Note that only uncontroversial content should be restored — not
revisions deleted as copyright violation, potentially libellous content or
similar") his actions can't be easily reversed, even temporarily, so that
the general community may take action, instead of the small group of admins.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l at lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Aneurysm-tf3868459.html#a11112741
Sent from the English Wikipedia mailing list archive at Nabble.com.