[WikiEN-l] BJAODN restored again

[Eugene van der Pijll]

The Cunctator schreef:
> On 6/12/07, Eugene van der Pijll <eugene at vanderpijll.nl> wrote:
> > The Cunctator schreef:
> > > That's a prima facie misinterpretation of the GFDL. The "section" it
> > > is referring to is obviously a Secondary Section:
> >
> > Why do you think so? It's not obvious to me.
> 
> Because it tells you how to create the section entitled History if a
> Document does not have one, and it is talking about the history of the
> Document's authorship.
> 
> Also because it would be absurd to author history in a chapter about
> the history of London.

On that last point, we agree.

I do hope this has been removed in the next version of the GFDL.

Eugene